Beacon Lights of History, Vol 1: The Old Pagan Civilizations — Confucius, Part 2

Confucius sometimes soared to the highest morality known to the Pagan world.

Chung-kung asked about perfect virtue.

The master said: "It is when you go abroad, to behave to every one as if you were receiving a great guest, to have no murmuring against you in the country and family, and not to do to others as you would not wish done to yourself....

The superior man has neither anxiety nor fear.

Let him never fail reverentially to order his own conduct, and let him be respectful to others and observant of propriety; then all within the four seas will be brothers....

Hold faithfulness and sincerity as first principles, and be moving continually to what is right."

Fan-Chi asked about benevolence;

the master said: "It is to love all men."

Another asked about friendship.

Confucius replied: "Faithfully admonish your friend, and kindly try to lead him.

If you find him impracticable, stop.

Do not disgrace yourself."

This saying reminds us of that of our great Master: "Cast not your pearls before swine."

There is no greater folly than in making oneself disagreeable without any probability of reformation.

Some one asked: "What do you say about the treatment of injuries?"

The master answered: "Recompense injury with justice, and recompense kindness with kindness."

Here again he was not far from the greater Teacher on the Mount "When a man's knowledge is sufficient to attain and his virtue is not sufficient to hold, whatever he may have gained he will lose again."

One of the favorite doctrines of Confucius was the superiority of the ancients to the men of his day.

Said he: "The high-mindedness of antiquity showed itself in a disregard of small things; that of the present day shows itself in license.

The stern dignity of antiquity showed itself in grave reserve; that of the present shows itself in quarrelsome perverseness.

The policy of antiquity showed itself in straightforwardness; that of the present in deceit."

The following is a saying worthy of Montaigne: "Of all people, girls and servants are the most difficult to behave to.

If you are familiar with them, they lose their humility; if you maintain reserve to them, they are discontented."

Such are some of the sayings of Confucius, on account of which he was regarded as the wisest of his countrymen; and as his conduct was in harmony with his principles, he was justly revered as a pattern of morality.

The greatest virtues which he enjoined were sincerity, truthfulness, and obedience to duty whatever may be the sacrifice; to do right because it is right and not because it is expedient; filial piety extending to absolute reverence; and an equal reverence for rulers.

He had no theology; he confounded God with heaven and earth.

He says nothing about divine providence; he believed in nothing supernatural.

He thought little and said less about a future state of rewards and punishments.

His morality was elevated, but not supernal.

We infer from his writings that his age was degenerate and corrupt, but, as we have already said, his reproofs were gentle.

Blandness of speech and manners was his distinguishing outward peculiarity; and this seems to characterize his nation,--whether learned from him, or whether an inborn national peculiarity, I do not know.

He went through great trials most creditably, but he was no martyr.

He constantly complained that his teachings fell on listless ears, which made him sad and discouraged; but he never flagged in his labors to improve his generation.

He had no egotism, but great self-respect, reminding us of Michael Angelo.

He was humble but full of dignity, serene though distressed, cheerful but not hilarious.

Were he to live among us now, we should call him a perfect gentleman, with aristocratic sympathies, but more autocratic in his views of government and society than aristocratic.

He seems to have loved the people, and was kind, even respectful, to everybody.

When he visited a school, it is said that he arose in quiet deference to speak to the children, since some of the boys, he thought, would probably be distinguished and powerful at no distant day.

He was also remarkably charitable, and put a greater value on virtues and abilities than upon riches and honors.

Though courted by princes he would not serve them in violation of his self-respect, asked no favors, and returned their presents.

If he did not live above the world, he adorned the world.

We cannot compare his teachings with those of Christ; they are immeasurably inferior in loftiness and spirituality; but they are worldly wise and decorous, and are on an equality with those of Solomon in moral wisdom.

They are wonderfully adapted to a people who are conservative of their institutions, and who have more respect for tradition than for progress.

The worship of ancestors is closely connected with veneration for parental authority; and with absolute obedience to parents is allied absolute obedience to the Emperor as head of the State.

Hence, the writings of Confucius have tended to cement the Chinese imperial power,--in which fact we may perhaps find the secret of his extraordinary posthumous influence.

No wonder that emperors and rulers have revered and honored his memory, and used the power of the State to establish his doctrines.

Moreover, his exaltation of learning as a necessity for rulers has tended to put all the offices of the realm into the hands of scholars.

There never was a country where scholars have been and still are so generally employed by Government.

And as men of learning are conservative in their sympathies, so they generally are fond of peace and detest war.

Hence, under the influence of scholars the policy of the Chinese Government has always been mild and pacific.

It is even paternal.

It has more similarity to the governments of a remote antiquity than that of any existing nation.

Thus is the influence of Confucius seen in the stability of government and of conservative institutions, as well as in decency in the affairs of life, and gentleness and courtesy of manners.

Above all is his influence seen in the employment of men of learning and character in the affairs of state and in all the offices of government, as the truest guardians of whatever tends to exalt a State and make it respectable and stable, if not powerful for war or daring in deeds of violence.

Confucius was essentially a statesman as well as a moralist; but his political career was an apparent failure, since few princes listened to his instructions.

Yet if he was lost to his contemporaries, he has been preserved by posterity.

Perhaps there never lived a man so worshipped by posterity who had so slight a following by the men of his own time,--unless we liken him to that greatest of all Prophets, who, being despised and rejected, is, and is to be, the "headstone of the corner" in the rebuilding of humanity.

Confucius says so little about the subjects that interested the people of China that some suppose he had no religion at all.

Nor did he mention but once in his writings Shang-te, the supreme deity of his remote ancestors; and he deduced nothing from the worship of him.

And yet there are expressions in his sayings which seem to show that he believed in a supreme power.

He often spoke of Heaven, and loved to walk in the heavenly way.

Heaven to him was Destiny, by the power of which the world was created.

By Heaven the virtuous are rewarded, and the guilty are punished.

Out of love for the people, Heaven appoints rulers to protect and instruct them.

Prayer is unnecessary, because Heaven does not actively interfere with the soul of man.

Confucius was philosophical and consistent in the all-pervading principle by which he insisted upon the common source of power in government,--of the State, of the family, and of one's self.

Self-knowledge and self-control he maintained to be the fountain of all personal virtue and attainment in performance of the moral duties owed to others, whether above or below in social standing.

He supposed that all men are born equally good, but that the temptations of the world at length destroy the original rectitude.

The "superior man," who next to the "sage" holds the highest place in the Confucian humanity, conquers the evil in the world, though subject to infirmities; his acts are guided by the laws of propriety, and are marked by strict sincerity.

Confucius admitted that he himself had failed to reach the level of the superior man.

This admission may have been the result of his extraordinary humility and modesty.

In "The Great Learning" Confucius lays down the rules to enable one to become a superior man.

The foundation of his rules is in the investigation of things, or _knowledge_, with which virtue is indissolubly connected,--as in the ethics of Socrates.

He maintained that no attainment can be made, and no virtue can remain untainted, without learning.

"Without this, benevolence becomes folly, sincerity recklessness, straightforwardness rudeness, and firmness foolishness."

But mere accumulation of facts was not knowledge, for "learning without thought is labor lost; and thought without learning is perilous."

Complete wisdom was to be found only among the ancient sages; by no mental endeavor could any man hope to equal the supreme wisdom of Yaou and of Shun.

The object of learning, he said, should be truth; and the combination of learning with a firm will, will surely lead a man to virtue.

Virtue must be free from all hypocrisy and guile.

The next step towards perfection is the _cultivation of the person_,--which must begin with introspection, and ends in harmonious outward expression.

Every man must guard his thoughts, words, and actions; and conduct must agree with words.

By words the superior man directs others; but in order to do this his words must be sincere.

It by no means follows, however, that virtue is the invariable concomitant of plausible speech.

The height of virtue is _filial piety_; for this is connected indissolubly with loyalty to the sovereign, who is the father of his people and the preserver of the State.

Loyalty to the sovereign is synonymous with duty, and is outwardly shown by obedience.

Next to parents, all superiors should be the object of reverence.

This reverence, it is true, should be reciprocal; a sovereign forfeits all right to reverence and obedience when he ceases to be a minister of good.

But then, only the man who has developed virtues in himself is considered competent to rule a family or a State; for the same virtues which enable a man to rule the one, will enable him to rule the other.

No man can teach others who cannot teach his own family.

The greatest stress, as we have seen, is laid by Confucius on filial piety, which consists in obedience to authority,--in serving parents according to propriety, that is, with the deepest affection, and the father of the State with loyalty.

But while it is incumbent on a son to obey the wishes of his parents, it is also a part of his duty to remonstrate with them should they act contrary to the rules of propriety.

All remonstrances, however, must be made humbly.

Should these remonstrances fail, the son must mourn in silence the obduracy of the parents.

He carried the obligations of filial piety so far as to teach that a son should conceal the immorality of a father, forgetting the distinction of right and wrong.

Brotherly love is the sequel of filial piety.

"Happy," says he, "is the union with wife and children; it is like the music of lutes and harps.

The love which binds brother to brother is second only to that which is due from children to parents.

It consists in mutual friendship, joyful harmony, and dutiful obedience on the part of the younger to the elder brothers."

While obedience is exacted to an elder brother and to parents, Confucius said but little respecting the ties which should bind husband and wife.

He had but little respect for woman, and was divorced from his wife after living with her for a year.

He looked on women as every way inferior to men, and only to be endured as necessary evils.

It was not until a woman became a mother, that she was treated with respect in China.

Hence, according to Confucius, the great object of marriage is to increase the family, especially to give birth to sons.

Women could be lawfully and properly divorced who had no children,--which put women completely in the power of men, and reduced them to the condition of slaves.

The failure to recognize the sanctity of marriage is the great blot on the system of Confucius as a scheme of morals.

But the sage exalts friendship.

Everybody, from the Emperor downward, must have friends; and the best friends are those allied by ties of blood.

"Friends," said he, "are wealth to the poor, strength to the weak, and medicine to the sick."

One of the strongest bonds to friendship is literature and literary exertion.

Men are enjoined by Confucius to make friends among the most virtuous of scholars, even as they are enjoined to take service under the most worthy of great officers.

In the intercourse of friends, the most unbounded sincerity and frankness is imperatively enjoined.

"He who is not trusted by his friends will not gain the confidence of the sovereign, and he who is not obedient to parents will not be trusted by friends."

Everything is subordinated to the State; but, on the other hand, the family, friends, culture, virtue,--the good of the people,--is the main object of good government.

"No virtue," said Emperor Kuh, 2435 B. C.

, "is higher than love to all men, and there is no loftier aim in government than to profit all men."

When he was asked what should be done for the people, he replied, "Enrich them;" and when asked what more should be done, he replied, "Teach them."

On these two principles the whole philosophy of the sage rested,--the temporal welfare of the people, and their education.

He laid great stress on knowledge, as leading to virtue; and on virtue, as leading to prosperity.

He made the profession of a teacher the most honorable calling to which a citizen could aspire.

He himself was a teacher.

All sages are teachers, though all teachers are not sages.

Confucius enlarged upon the necessity of having good men in office.

The officials of his day excited his contempt, and reciprocally scorned his teachings.

It was in contrast to these officials that he painted the ideal times of Kings Wan and Woo.

The two motive-powers of government, according to Confucius, are righteousness and the observance of ceremonies.

Righteousness is the law of the world, as ceremonies form a rule to the heart.

What he meant by ceremonies was rules of propriety, intended to keep all unruly passions in check, and produce a reverential manner among all classes.

Doubtless he over-estimated the force of example, since there are men in every country and community who will be lawless and reckless, in spite of the best models of character and conduct.

The ruling desire of Confucius was to make the whole empire peaceful and happy.

The welfare of the people, the right government of the State, and the prosperity of the empire were the main objects of his solicitude.

As conducive to these, he touched on many other things incidentally,--such as the encouragement of music, of which he was very fond.

He himself summed up the outcome of his rules for conduct in this prohibitive form: "Do not unto others that which you would not have them do to you."

Here we have the negative side of the positive "golden rule."

Reciprocity, and that alone, was his law of life.

He does not inculcate forgiveness of injuries, but exacts a tooth for a tooth, and an eye for an eye.

As to his own personal character, it was nearly faultless.

His humility and patience were alike remarkable, and his sincerity and candor were as marked as his humility.

He was the most learned man in the empire, yet lamented the deficiency of his knowledge.

He even disclaimed the qualities of the superior man, much more those of the sage.

"I am," said he, "not virtuous enough to be free from cares, nor wise enough to be free from anxieties, nor bold enough to be free from fear."

He was always ready to serve his sovereign or the State; but he neither grasped office, nor put forward his own merits, nor sought to advance his own interests.

He was grave, generous, tolerant, and sincere.

He carried into practice all the rules he taught.

Poverty was his lot in life, but he never repined at the absence of wealth, or lost the severe dignity which is ever to be associated with wisdom and the force of personal character.

Indeed, his greatness was in his character rather than in his genius; and yet I think his genius has been underrated.

His greatness is seen in the profound devotion of his followers to him, however lofty their merits or exalted their rank.

No one ever disputed his influence and fame; and his moral excellence shines all the brighter in view of the troublous times in which he lived, when warriors occupied the stage, and men of letters were driven behind the scenes.

The literary labors of Confucius were very great, since he made the whole classical literature of China accessible to his countrymen.

The fame of all preceding writers is merged in his own renown.

His works have had the highest authority for more than two thousand years.

They have been regarded as the exponents of supreme wisdom, and adopted as text-books by all scholars and in all schools in that vast empire, which includes one-fourth of the human race.

To all educated men the "Book of Changes" (Yin-King), the "Book of Poetry" (She-King), the "Book of History" (Shoo-King), the "Book of Rites" (Le-King), the "Great Learning" (Ta-heo), showing the parental essence of all government, the "Doctrine of the Mean" (Chung-yung), teaching the "golden mean" of conduct, and the "Confucian Analects" (Lun-yu), recording his conversations, are supreme authorities; to which must be added the Works of Mencius, the greatest of his disciples.

There is no record of any books that have exacted such supreme reverence in any nation as the Works of Confucius, except the Koran of the Mohammedans, the Book of the Law among the Hebrews, and the Bible among the Christians.

What an influence for one man to have exerted on subsequent ages, who laid no claim to divinity or even originality,--recognized as a man, worshipped as a god!

No sooner had the sun of Confucius set under a cloud (since sovereigns and princes had neglected if they had not scorned his precepts), than his memory and principles were duly honored.

But it was not until the accession of the Han dynasty, 206 B. C.

, that the reigning emperor collected the scattered writings of the sage, and exerted his vast power to secure the study of them throughout the schools of China.

It must be borne in mind that a hostile emperor of the preceding dynasty had ordered the books of Confucius to be burned; but they were secreted by his faithful admirers in the walls of houses and beneath the ground.

Succeeding emperors heaped additional honors on the memory of the sage, and in the early part of the sixteenth century an emperor of the Ming dynasty gave him the title which he at present bears in China,--"The perfect sage, the ancient teacher, Confucius."

No higher title could be conferred upon him in a land where to be "ancient" is to be revered.

For more than twelve hundred years temples have been erected to his honor, and his worship has been universal throughout the empire.

His maxims of morality have appealed to human consciousness in every succeeding generation, and carry as much weight to-day as they did when the Han dynasty made them the standard of human wisdom.

They were especially adapted to the Chinese intellect, which although shrewd and ingenious is phlegmatic, unspeculative, matter-of-fact, and unspiritual.

Moreover, as we have said, it was to the interest of rulers to support his doctrines, from the constant exhortations to loyalty which Confucius enjoined.

And yet there is in his precepts a democratic influence also, since he recognized no other titles or ranks but such as are won by personal merit,--thus opening every office in the State to the learned, whatever their original social rank.

The great political truth that the welfare of the people is the first duty and highest aim of rulers, has endeared the memory of the sage to the unnumbered millions who toil upon the scantiest means of subsistence that have been known in any nation's history.

This essay on the religion of the Chinese would be incomplete without some allusion to one of the contemporaries of Confucius, who spiritually and intellectually was probably his superior, and to whom even Confucius paid extraordinary deference.

This man was called Lao-tse, a recluse and philosopher, who was already an old man when Confucius began his travels.

He was the founder of Tao-tze, a kind of rationalism, which at present has millions of adherents in China.

This old philosopher did not receive Confucius very graciously, since the younger man declared nothing new, only wishing to revive the teachings of ancient sages, while he himself was a great awakener of thought.

He was, like Confucius, a politico-ethical teacher, but unlike him sought to lead people back to a state of primitive society before forms and regulations existed.

He held that man's nature was good, and that primitive pleasures and virtues were better than worldly wisdom.

He maintained that spiritual weapons cannot be formed by laws and regulations, and that prohibiting enactments tended to increase the evils they were meant to avert.

While this great and profound man was in some respects superior to Confucius, his influence has been most seen on the inferior people of China.

Taoism rivals Buddhism as the religion of the lower classes, and Taoism combined with Buddhism has more adherents than Confucianism.

But the wise, the mighty, and the noble still cling to Confucius as the greatest man whom China has produced.

Of spiritual religion, indeed, the lower millions of Chinese have now but little conception; their nearest approach to any supernaturalism is the worship of deceased ancestors, and their religious observances are the grossest formalism.

But as a practical system of morals in the days of its early establishment, the religion of Confucius ranks very high among the best developments of Paganism.

Certainly no man ever had a deeper knowledge of his countrymen than he, or adapted his doctrines to the peculiar needs of their social organism with such amazing tact.

It is a remarkable thing that all the religions of antiquity have practically passed away, with their cities and empires, except among the Hindus and Chinese; and it is doubtful if these religions can withstand the changes which foreign conquest and Christian missionary enterprise and civilization are producing.

In the East the old religions gave place to Mohamedanism, as in the West they disappeared before the power of Christianity.

And these conquering religions retain and extend their hold upon the human mind and human affections by reason of their fundamental principles,--the fatherhood of a personal God, and the brotherhood of universal man.

With the ideas prevalent among all sects that God is not only supreme in power, but benevolent in his providence, and that every man has claims and rights which cannot be set aside by kings or rulers or priests,--nations must indefinitely advance in virtue and happiness, as they receive and live by the inspiration of this elevating faith.

* * * * * AUTHORITIES.

Religion in China, by Joseph Edkins, D. D.

; Rawlinson's Religions of the Ancient World; Freeman Clarke's Ten Great Religions; Johnson's Oriental Religions; Davis's Chinese; Nevins's China and the Chinese; Giles's Chinese Sketches; Lenormant's Ancient History of the East; Hue's Christianity in China; Legge's Prolegomena to the Shoo-King; Lecomte's China; Dr. S.

Wells Williams's Middle Kingdom; China, by Professor Douglas; The Religions of China, by James Legge.

ANCIENT PHILOSOPHY.