Mob Rule In New Orleans — Was Charles a Desperado?

+WAS CHARLES A DESPERADO?

+ The press of the country has united in declaring that Robert Charles was a desperado.

As usual, when dealing with a negro, he is assumed to be guilty because he is charged.

Even the most conservative of journals refuse to ask evidence to prove that the dead man was a criminal, and that his life had been given over to lawbreaking.

The minute that the news was flashed across the country that he had shot a white man it was at once declared that he was a fiend incarnate, and that when he was killed the community would be ridden of a black-hearted desperado.

The reporters of the New Orleans papers, who were in the best position to trace the record of this man's life, made every possible effort to find evidence to prove that he was a villain unhung.

With all the resources at their command, and inspired by intense interest to paint him as black a villain as possible, these reporters signally failed to disclose a single indictment which charged Robert Charles with a crime.

Because they failed to find any legal evidence that Charles was a lawbreaker and desperado his accusers gave full license to their imagination and distorted the facts that they had obtained, in every way possible, to prove a course of criminality, which the records absolutely refuse to show.

Charles had his first encounter with the police Monday night, in which he was shot in the street duel which was begun by the police after Officer Mora had beaten Charles three or four times over the head with his billy in an attempt to make an illegal arrest.

In defending himself against the combined attack of two officers with a billy and their guns upon him, Charles shot Officer Mora and escaped.

Early Tuesday morning Charles was traced to Dryades Street by officers who were instructed to kill him on sight.

There, again defending himself, he shot and killed two officers.

This, of course, in the eyes of the American press, made him a desperado.

The New Orleans press, in substantiating the charges that he was a desperado, make statements which will be interesting to examine.

In the first place the _New Orleans Times-Democrat_, of July 25, calls Charles a "ravisher and a daredevil."

It says that from all sources that could be searched "the testimony was cumulative that the character of the murderer, Robert Charles, is that of a daredevil and a fiend in human form."

Then in the same article it says: The belongings of Robert Charles which were found in his room were a complete index to the character of the man.

Although the room and its contents were in a state of chaos on account of the frenzied search for clews by officers and citizens, an examination of his personal effects revealed the mental state of the murderer and the rancor in his heart toward the Caucasian race.

Never was the adage, "A little learning is a dangerous thing," better exemplified than in the case of the negro who shot to death the two officers.

His room was searched, and the evidence upon which the charge that he was a desperado consisted of pamphlets in support of Negro emigration to Liberia.

On his mantel-piece there was found a bullet mold and an outfit for reloading cartridges.

There were also two pistol scabbards and a bottle of cocaine.

The other evidences that Charles was a desperado the writer described as follows: In his room were found negro periodicals and other "race" propaganda, most of which was in the interest of the negro's emigration to Liberia.

There were Police Gazettes strewn about his room and other papers of a similar character.

Well-worn textbooks, bearing his name written in his own scrawling handwriting, and well-filled copybooks found in his trunk showed that he had burnt the midnight oil, and was desirous of improving himself intellectually in order that he might conquer the hated white race.

Much of the literature found among his chattels was of a superlatively vituperative character, and attacked the white race in unstinted language and asserted the equal rights of the Negro.

Charles was evidently the local agent of the _Voice of Missions_, a "religious" paper, published at Atlanta, as great bundles of that sheet were found.

It is edited by one Bishop Turner, and seems to be the official organ of all haters of the white race.

Its editorials are anarchistic in the extreme, and urge upon the negro that the sooner he realizes that he is as good as the white man the better it will be for him.

The following verses were clipped from the journal; they were marked "till forbidden," and appeared in several successive numbers: OUR SENTIMENTS

H.

M. T.

My country, 'tis of thee, Dear land of Africa, Of thee we sing.

Land where our fathers died, Land of the Negro's pride, God's truth shall ring.

My native country, thee, Land of the black and free, Thy name I love;

To see thy rocks and rills, Thy woods and matchless hills, Like that above.

When all thy slanderous ghouls, In the bosom of sheol, Forgotten lie, Thy monumental name shall live, And suns thy royal brow shall gild, Upheaved to heaven high, O'ertopping thrones.

There were no valuables in his room, and if he was a professional thief he had his headquarters for storing his plunder at some other place than his room on Fourth Street.

Nothing was found in his room that could lead to the belief that he was a thief, except fifty or more small bits of soap.

The inference was that every place he visited he took all of the soap lying around, as all of the bits were well worn and had seen long service on the washstand.

His wearing apparel was little more than rags, and financially he was evidently not in a flourishing condition.

He was in no sense a skilled workman, and his room showed, in fact, that he was nothing more than a laborer.

The "philosopher in the garret" was a dirty wretch, and his room, his bedding and his clothing were nasty and filthy beyond belief.

His object in life seemed to have been the discomfiture of the white race, and to this purpose he devoted himself with zeal.

He declared himself to be a "patriot," and wished to be the Moses of his race.

Under the title of "The Making of a Monster," the reporter attempts to give "something of the personality of the archfiend, Charles."

Giving his imagination full vent the writer says: It is only natural that the deepest interest should attach to the personality of Robert Charles.

What manner of man was this fiend incarnate?

What conditions developed him?

Who were his preceptors?

From what ancestral strain, if any, did he derive his ferocious hatred of the whites, his cunning, his brute courage, the apostolic zeal which he displayed in spreading the propaganda of African equality?

These are questions involving one of the most remarkable psychological problems of modern times.

In answer to the questions which he propounds, the reporter proceeds to admit that he did not learn anything of a very desperate nature connected with Charles.

He says: Although Charles was a familiar figure to scores of Negroes in New Orleans, and they had been more or less intimately acquainted with him for over two years, curiously little can be learned of his habits or mode of life.

Since the perpetration of his terrible series of crimes it goes without saying that his former friends are inclined to be reticent, but it is reasonably certain that they have very little to tell.

In regard to himself, Charles was singularly reticent for a Negro.

He did not even indulge in the usual lying about his prowess and his adventures.

This was possibly due to the knowledge that he was wanted for a couple of murders.

The man had sense enough to know that it would be highly unwise to excite any curiosity about his past.

When Charles first came to New Orleans he worked here and there as a day laborer.

He was employed at different times in a sawmill, on the street gangs, as a roustabout on the levee, as a helper at the sugar works and as a coal shoveler in the engine room of the St. Charles Hotel.

At each of the places where he worked he was known as a quiet, rather surly fellow, who had little to say to anybody, and generally performed his tasks in morose silence.

He managed to convey the impression, however, of being a man of more than ordinary intelligence.

A Negro named William Butts, who drives a team on the levee and lives on Washington Street, near Baronne, told a _Times-Democrat_ reporter yesterday that Charles got a job about a year ago as agent for a Liberian Immigration Society, which has headquarters at Birmingham, and was much elated at the prospect of making a living without hard labor.

According to the further investigations of this reporter, Charles was also agent for Bishop Turner's _Voice of Missions_, the colored missionary organ of the African Methodist Church, edited by H. M.

Turner, of Atlanta, Georgia.

Concerning his service as agent for the _Voice of Missions_, the reporter says: He secured a number of subscribers and visited them once a month to collect the installments.

In order to insure regular payments it was necessary to keep up enthusiasm, which was prone to wane, and Charles consequently became an active and continual preacher of the propaganda of hatred.

Whatever may have been his private sentiments at the outset, this constant harping on one string must eventually have had a powerful effect upon his own mind.

Exactly how he received his remuneration is uncertain, but he told several of his friends that he got a "big commission."

Incidentally he solicited subscribers for a Negro paper called the _Voice of the Missions_, and when he struck a Negro who did not want to go to Africa himself, he begged contributions for the "good of the cause."

In the course of time Charles developed into a fanatic on the subject of the Negro oppression and neglected business to indulge in wild tirades whenever he could find a listener.

He became more anxious to make converts than to obtain subscribers, and the more conservative darkies began to get afraid of him.

Meanwhile he got into touch with certain agitators in the North and made himself a distributing agent for their literature, a great deal of which he gave away.

Making money was a secondary consideration to "the cause."

One of the most enthusiastic advocates of the Liberian scheme is the colored Bishop H. M.

Turner, of Atlanta.

Turner is a man of unusual ability, has been over to Africa personally several times, and has made himself conspicuous by denouncing laws which he claimed discriminated against the blacks.

Charles was one of the bishop's disciples and evidence has been found that seems to indicate they were in correspondence.

This was all that the _Times-Democrat_'s reporters could find after the most diligent search to prove that Charles was the fiend incarnate which the press of New Orleans and elsewhere declared him to be.

The reporters of the _New Orleans Picayune_ were no more successful than their brethren of the _Times-Democrat_.

They, too, were compelled to substitute fiction for facts in their attempt to prove Charles a desperado.

In the issue of the twenty-sixth of July it was said that Charles was well known in Vicksburg, and was there a consort of thieves.

They mentioned that a man named Benson Blake was killed in 1894 or 1895, and that four Negroes were captured, and two escaped.

Of the two escaped they claim that Charles was one.

The four negroes who were captured were put in jail, and as usual, in the high state of civilization which characterizes Mississippi, the right of the person accused of crime to an indictment by legal process and a legal trial by jury was considered an useless formality if the accused happened to be black.

A mob went to the jail that night, the four colored men were delivered to the mob, and all four were hanged in the court-house yard.

The reporters evidently assumed that Charles was guilty, if, in fact, he was ever there, because the other four men were lynched.

They did not consider it was a fact of any importance that Charles was never indicted.

They called him a murderer on general principles.