Reconciliation of Races and Religions — 17 – [Part III. Biographical and Historical (continued)]: Ṣubḥ-i-Ezel (or Azal); Subsequent Discoveries.

ṢUBḤ-I-EZEL (OR AZAL)

'He is a scion of one of the noble families of Persia.

His father was accomplished, wealthy, and much respected, and enjoyed the high consideration of the King and nobles of Persia.

His mother died when he was a child.

His father thereupon entrusted him to the keeping of his honourable spouse, [Footnote: _NH_, pp. 374 _ff_.

] saying, "Do you take care of this child, and see that your handmaids attend to him properly."

' This 'honourable spouse' is, in the context, called 'the concubine'--apparently a second wife is meant.

At any rate her son was no less honoured than if he had been the son of the chief or favourite wife; he was named Ḥuseyn 'Ali, and his young half-brother was named Yaḥya.

According to Mirza Jani, the account which the history contains was given him by Mirza Ḥuseyn 'Ali's half-brother, who represents that the later kindness of his own mother to the young child Yaḥya was owing to a prophetic dream which she had, and in which the Apostle of God and the King of Saintship figured as the child's protectors.

Evidently this part of the narrative is imaginative, and possibly it is the work of Mirza Jani.

But there is no reason to doubt that what follows is based more or less on facts derived from Mirza Ḥuseyn 'Ali.

'I busied myself,' says the latter, 'with the instruction of [Yaḥya].

The signs of his natural excellence and goodness of disposition were apparent in the mirror of his being.

He ever loved gravity of demeanour, silence, courtesy, and modesty, avoiding the society of other children and their behaviour.

I did not, however, know that he would become the possessor of [so high] a station.

He studied Persian, but made little progress in Arabic.

He wrote a good _nasta'lik_ hand, and was very fond of the poems of the mystics.'

The facts may be decked out.

Mirza Jani himself only met Mirza Yaḥya once.

He describes him as 'an amiable child.'

[Footnote: _NH_, p. 376. ] Certainly, we can easily suppose that he retained a childlike appearance longer than most, for he early became a mystic, and a mystic is one whose countenance is radiant with joy.

This, indeed, may be the reason why they conferred on him the name, 'Dawn of Eternity.'

He never saw the Bāb, but when his 'honoured brother' would read the Master's writings in a circle of friends, Mirza Yaḥya used to listen, and conceived a fervent love for the inspired author.

At the time of the Manifestation of the Bāb he was only fourteen, but very soon after, he, like his brother, took the momentous step of becoming a Bābī, and resolved to obey the order of the Bāb for his followers to proceed to Khurasan.

So, 'having made for himself a knapsack, and got together a few necessaries,' he set out as an evangelist, 'with perfect trust in his Beloved,' somewhat as S. Teresa started from her home at Avila to evangelize the Moors.

'But when his brother was informed of this, he sent and prevented him.'

[Footnote: _NH_, p. 44. ] Compensation, however, was not denied him.

Some time after, Yaḥya made an expedition in company with some of his relations, making congenial friends, and helping to strengthen the Bābī cause.

He was now not far off the turning-point in his life.

Not long after occurred a lamentable set-back to the cause--the persecution and massacre which followed the attempt on the Shah's life by an unruly Bābī in August 1852. He himself was in great danger, but felt no call to martyrdom, and set out in the disguise of a dervish [Footnote: _TN_, p. 374. ] in the same direction as his elder brother, reaching Baghdad somewhat later.

There, among the Bābī refugees, he found new and old friends who adhered closely to the original type of theosophic doctrine; an increasing majority, however, were fascinated by a much more progressive teacher.

The Ezelite history known as _Hasht Bihisht_ ('Eight Paradises') gives the names of the chief members of the former school, [Footnote: _TN_, p. 356. ] including Sayyid Muḥammad of Isfahan, and states that, perceiving Mirza Ḥuseyn 'Ali's innovating tendencies, they addressed to him a vigorous remonstrance.

It was, in fact, an ecclesiastical crisis, as the authors of the _Traveller's Narrative_, as well as the Ezelite historian, distinctly recognize.

Baha-'ullah, too,--to give him his nobler name--endorses this view when he says, 'Then, in secret, the Sayyid of Isfahan circumvented him, and together they did that which caused a great calamity.'

It was, therefore, indeed a crisis, and the chief blame is laid on Sayyid Muḥammad.

[Footnote: _TN_, p. 94. 'He (i. e. Sayyid Muḥammad) commenced a secret intrigue, and fell to tempting Mirza Yaḥya, saying, "The fame of this sect hath risen high in the world; neither dread nor danger remaineth, nor is there any fear or need for caution before you."

'] Ṣubḥ-i-Ezel is still a mere youth and easily imposed upon; the Sayyid ought to have known better than to tempt him, for a stronger teacher was needed in this period of disorganization than the Ezelites could produce.

Mirza Yaḥya was not up to the leadership, nor was he entitled to place himself above his much older brother, especially when he was bound by the tie of gratitude.

'Remember,' says Baha-'ullah, 'the favour of thy master, when we brought thee up during the nights and days for the service of the Religion.

Fear God, and be of those who repent.

Grant that thine affair is dubious unto me; is it dubious unto thyself?'

How gentle is this fraternal reproof!

There is but little more to relate that has not been already told in the sketch of Baha-'ullah.

He was, at any rate, harmless in Cyprus, and had no further opportunity for religious assassination.

One cannot help regretting that his sun went down so stormily.

I return therefore to the question of the honorific names of Mirza Yaḥya, after which I shall refer to the singular point of the crystal coffin and to the moral character of Ṣubḥ-i-Ezel.

Among the names and titles which the Ezelite book called _Eight Paradises_ declares to have been conferred by the Bāb on his young disciple are Ṣubḥ-i-Ezel (or Azal), Baha-'ullah, and the strange title _Mir'at_ (Mirror).

The two former--'Dawn of Eternity' and 'Splendour of God'--are referred to elsewhere.

The third properly belongs to a class of persons inferior to the 'Letters of the Living,' and to this class Ṣubḥ-i-Ezel, by his own admission, belongs.

The title Mir'at, therefore, involves some limitation of Ezel's dignity, and its object apparently is to prevent Ṣubḥ-i-Ezel from claiming to be 'He whom God will make manifest.'

That is, the Bāb in his last years had an intuition that the eternal day would not be ushered into existence by this impractical nature.

How, then, came the Bāb to give Mirza Yaḥya such a name?

Purely from cabbalistic reasons which do not concern us here.

It was a mistake which only shows that the Bāb was not infallible.

Mirza Yaḥya had no great part to play in the ushering-in of the new cycle.

Elsewhere the Bāb is at the pains to recommend the elder of the half-brothers to attend to his junior's writing and spelling.

[Footnote: The Tablets (letters) are in the British Museum collection, in four books of Ezel, who wrote the copies at Baha-'ullah's dictation.

The references are--I. , No. 6251, p. 162; II.

, No. 5111, p. 253, to which copy Rizwan Ali, son of Ezel, has appended 'The brother of the Fruit' (Ezel); III.

, No. 6254, p. 236; IV.

, No. 6257, p. 158. ] Now it was, of course, worth while to educate Mirza Yaḥya, whose feebleness in Arabic grammar was scandalous, but can we imagine Baha-'ullah and all the other 'letters' being passed over by the Bāb in favour of such an imperfectly educated young man?

The so-called 'nomination' is a bare-faced forgery.

The statement of Gobineau that Ṣubḥ-i-Ezel belonged to the 'Letters of the Living' of the First Unity is untrustworthy.

[Footnote: _Fils du Loup_, p. 156 n. 3. ] M.

Hippolyte Dreyfus has favoured me with a reliable list of the members of the First Unity, which I have given elsewhere, and which does not contain the name of Mirza Yaḥya.

At the same time, the Bāb may have admitted him into the second hierarchy of 18[19].

[Footnote: _Fils du Loup_, p. 163 n. 1. 'The eighteen Letters of Life had each a _mirror_ which represented it, and which was called upon to replace it if it disappeared.

There are, therefore, 18 Letters of Life and 18 Mirrors, which constituted two distinct Unities.'

] Considering that Mirza Yaḥya was regarded as a 'return' of Ḳuddus, some preferment may conceivably have found its way to him.

It was no contemptible distinction to be a member of the Second Unity, i. e. to be one of those who reflected the excellences of the older 'Letters of the Living.'

As a member of the Second Unity and the accepted reflexion of Ḳuddus, Ṣubḥ-i-Ezel may have been thought of as a director of affairs together with the obviously marked-out agent (_wali_), Baha-'ullah.

We are not told, however, that Mirza Yaḥya assumed either the title of Bāb (Gate) or that of Nuḳṭa (Point).

[Footnote: Others, however, give it him (_TN_, p. 353).

] I must confess that Ṣubḥ-i-Ezel's account of the fortune of the Bāb's relics appears to me, as well as to M. Nicolas, [Footnote: _AMB_, p. 380 n. ] unsatisfactory and (in one point) contradictory.

How, for instance, did he get possession of the relics?

And, is there any independent evidence for the intermingling of the parts of the two corpses?

How did he procure a crystal coffin to receive the relics?

How comes it that there were Bahaites at the time of the Bāb's death, and how was Ṣubḥ-i-Ezel able to conceal the crystal coffin, etc. , from his brother Baha-'ullah?

Evidently Ṣubḥ-i-Ezel has changed greatly since the time when both the brothers (half-brothers) were devoted, heart and soul, to the service of the Bāb. It is this moral transformation which vitiates Ṣubḥ-i-Ezel's assertions.

Can any one doubt this?

Surely the best authorities are agreed that the sense of historical truth is very deficient among the Persians.

Now Ṣubḥ-i-Ezel was in some respects a typical Persian; that is how I would explain his deviations from strict truth.

It may be added that the detail of the crystal coffin can be accounted for.

In the Arabic Bayan, among other injunctions concerning the dead, [Footnote: _Le Beyan Arabi_ (Nicolas), p. 252; similarly, p. 54. ] it is said: 'As for your dead, inter them in crystal, or in cut and polished stones.

It is possible that this may become a peace for your heart.'

This precept suggested to Ṣubḥ-i-Ezel his extraordinary statement.

Ṣubḥ-i-Ezel had an imaginative and possibly a partly mystic nature.

As a Manifestation of God he may have thought himself entitled to remove harmful people, even his own brother.

He did not ask himself whether he might not be in error in attaching such importance to his own personality, and whether any vision could override plain morality.

He _was_ mistaken, and I hold that the Bāb was mistaken in appointing (if he really did so) Ṣubḥ-i-Ezel as a nominal head of the Bābīs when the true, although temporary vice-gerent was Baha-'ullah.

For Ṣubḥ-i-Ezel was a consummate failure; it is too plain that the Bab did not always, like Jesus and like the Buddha, know what was in man.

SUBSEQUENT DISCOVERIES

The historical work of the Ezelite party, called _The Eight Paradises_, makes Ezel nineteen years of age when he came forward as an expounder of religious mysteries and wrote letters to the Bāb. On receiving the first letter, we are told that the Bāb (or, as we should rather now call him, the Point) instantly prostrated himself in thankfulness, testifying that he was a mighty Luminary, and spoke by the Self-shining Light, by revelation.

Imprisoned as he was at Maku, the Point of Knowledge could not take counsel with all his fellow-workers or disciples, but he sent the writings of this brilliant novice (if he really was so brilliant) to each of the 'Letters of the Living,' and to the chief believers, at the same time conferring on him a number of titles, including Ṣubḥ-i-Ezel ('Dawn of Eternity') and Baha-'ullah ('Splendour of God ').

If this statement be correct, we may plausibly hold with Professor E.

G.

Browne that Ṣubḥ-i-Ezel (Mirza Yaḥya) was advanced to the rank of a 'Letter of the Living,' and even that he was nominated by the Point as his successor.

It has also become much more credible that the thoughts of the Point were so much centred on Ṣubḥ-i-Ezel that, as Ezelites say, twenty thousand of the words of the Bayan refer to Ezel, and that a number of precious relics of the Point were entrusted to his would-be successor.

But how can we venture to say that it is correct?

Since Professor Browne wrote, much work has been done on the (real or supposed) written remains of Ṣubḥ-i-Ezel, and the result has been (I think) that the literary reputation of Ṣubḥ-i-Ezel is a mere bubble.

It is true, the Bāb himself was not masterly, but the confusion of ideas and language in Ezel's literary records beggars all comparison.

A friend of mine confirms this view which I had already derived from Mirza Ali Akbar.

He tells me that he has acquired a number of letters mostly purporting to be by Ṣubḥ-i-Ezel.

There is also, however, a letter of Baha-'ullah relative to these letters, addressed to the Muḥammadan mullā, the original possessor of the letters.

In this letter Baha-'ullah repeats again and again the warning: 'When you consider and reflect on these letters, you will understand who is in truth the writer.'

I greatly fear that Lord Curzon's description of Persian untruthfulness may be illustrated by the career of the Great Pretender.

The Ezelites must, of course, share the blame with their leader, and not the least of their disgraceful misstatements is the assertion that the Bāb assigned the name Baha-'ullah to the younger of the two half-brothers, and that Ezel had also the [non-existent] dignity of 'Second Point.'

This being so, I am strongly of opinion that so far from confirming the Ezelite view of subsequent events, the Ezelite account of Ṣubḥ-i-Ezel's first appearance appreciably weakens it.

Something, however, we may admit as not improbable.

It may well have gratified the Bāb that two representatives of an important family in Mazandaran had taken up his cause, and the character of these new adherents may have been more congenial to him than the more martial character of Ḳuddus.